Citation: | FENG Zongxian, LIU Yuan, LI Xinyi. Impact of Trade Sanctions on the International Energy Trade Pattern: Based on Simulation Analysis of Partial Equilibrium and Trade Network[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2023, 23(3): 94-112. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202303094 |
Under the current complex global energy trade relations, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the sanctions imposed by Europe and the United States have had a major impact on the international energy trade pattern. Based on the 2020 world energy trade data, this paper uses the 12-country GSIM model and the trade network model to simulate four possible trade sanctions scenarios and analyze the four effects of trade sanctions, namely, destructive effect, leakage effect, deflection effect and inhibition effect, on the changes of energy trade volume, output, welfare level and trade pattern. The results show that: (1) for the sanction-offering countries and Russia, when the degree of trade sanctions is relatively light, the trade volume and output of the countries are almost unchanged; when the degree of trade sanctions is large, the energy trade between the sanction-offering countries and Russia will be seriously affected by the trade disruption effect, which will eventually lead to a significant decline in the trade volume and output of both sides; moreover, there is a leakage effect in the process of trade sanctions, but the leakage effect cannot offset the impact of the destructive effect on the sanction-offering countries and Russia. (2) For non-sanctioned countries, the energy import trade with Russia has increased under the influence of the trade deflection effect of sanctions, while the energy trade with sanction-offering countries is affected by both the deflection effect and the inhibition effect, and the trade volume has increased and decreased. (3) From the perspective of welfare, with the increase of trade sanctions, the destructive effect of trade sanctions has led to a decline in the net social welfare of the sanction-offering countries and Russia, and the net welfare loss of the EU even exceeds that of Russia. (4) The closeness of the energy trade pattern network will decrease with the aggravation of sanctions. The focus of Russia's energy exports will shift from Europe to Asia. The EU's energy imports will shift from Russia before the sanctions to the United States and Middle East countries, and the Middle East countries will become the most important energy import regions of Japan and South Korea.
[1] |
扬汤止沸殃池鱼欧洲难咽能源危机苦果[EB/OL]. (2022-05-21)[2022-07-10]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1733423396279167990&wfr=spider&for=pc.
|
[2] |
MARKUS S. Long-term business implications of Russia's war in Ukraine[J/OL]. Asian Business & Management, Published: 21 May 2022[2022-07-01]. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-022-00181-7.
|
[3] |
易小准, 李晓, 盛斌, 等. 俄乌冲突对国际经贸格局的影响[J]. 国际经济评论, 2022(3): 9-37, 4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJPP202203001.htm
|
[4] |
TOSUN O K, ESHRAGHI A. Corporate decisions in times of war: evidence from the Russia-Ukraine conflict[J/OL]. Finance Research Letters, 2022(48): 102920[2022-07-01]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102920.
|
[5] |
倪峰, 达巍, 冯仲平, 等. 俄乌冲突对国际政治格局的影响[J]. 国际经济评论, 2022(3): 38-67, 4-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJPP202203002.htm
|
[6] |
GARY C H, JEFFREY J S. Economic sanctions reconsidered[M]. 3rd Edition. Washington, D. C. : Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2007: 91-94.
|
[7] |
KAEMPFER W H, LOWENBERG A D. The theory of international economic sanctions——a public choice approach: reply[J]. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 1989, 79(5): 1304-1306.
|
[8] |
DAVID A, BALDWIN. Evaluating economic sanctions[J]. International Security, 1998, 23(2): 189-195. doi: 10.1162/isec.23.2.189
|
[9] |
JAMES B. Economic sanctions as a policy instrument[J]. International Affairs, 1979, 55(3): 367-384. doi: 10.2307/2615145
|
[10] |
石斌. 有效制裁与"正义制裁"——论国际经济制裁的政治动因与伦理维度[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2010(8): 24-47, 156-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJJZ201008004.htm
|
[11] |
DANIEL W F. Economicsanctions: the Cuba embargo revisited[M]//CHAN S, DRURY A C. Sanctions as economic statecraft: theory and practice. New York: Macmillan, St. Martin's Press, 2000: 65-85.
|
[12] |
MAYALL J. The sanctions problem in international economic relations: reflections in the light of recent experience[J]. International Affairs, 1984, 60(4): 631-642. doi: 10.2307/2620046
|
[13] |
冯宗宪, 向洪金. 欧美对华反倾销措施的贸易效应: 理论与经验研究[J]. 世界经济, 2010, 33(3): 31-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJJJ201003004.htm
|
[14] |
LINDSAY J M. Tradesanctions as policy instruments: a reexamination[J]. International Studies Quarterly, 1986, 30(2): 153-173. doi: 10.2307/2600674
|
[15] |
LEKTZIAN D, SOUVA M. Aninstitutional theory of sanctions onset and success[J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), 2007, 51(6): 848-871.
|
[16] |
SLAVOV S T. Innocent ornot-so-innocent bystanders: evidence from the gravity model of international trade about the effects of UN sanctions on neighbor countries[J]. The World Economy, 2007, 30(11): 1701-1725. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01026.x
|
[17] |
KEOHANE R O. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in world political economy[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984: 49-64.
|
[18] |
OSSA R. Tradewars and trade talks with data[J]. NBER Working Papers, 2014, 104(12): 4104-4146.
|
[19] |
丁一兵, 张弘媛. 关税壁垒对中国嵌入全球价值链的影响[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 73(4): 93-108. doi: 10.14086/j.cnki.wujss.2020.04.010
|
[20] |
GOLDBERG P K, PAVCNIK N. The effects of trade policy[M]// KYLE B, ROBERT S. Handbook of commercial policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press, 2016: 161-206.
|
[21] |
李清如. 关税与非关税壁垒对贸易获益的影响——基于要素禀赋与资源错配理论的实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2016(12): 113-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJWS201612016.htm
|
[22] |
涂涛涛. 农产品技术贸易壁垒对中国经济影响的实证分析: 基于GTAP与China-CGE模型[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2011(5): 88-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMW201105011.htm
|
[23] |
宫同瑶, 辛贤, 潘文卿. 贸易壁垒变动对中国—东盟农产品贸易的影响——基于边境效应的测算及分解[J]. 中国农村经济, 2012(2): 64-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201202006.htm
|
[24] |
BRANDT L, MORROW P M. Tariffs and the organization of trade in China[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2017, 104(1): 85-103.
|
[25] |
HERTEL T, HUMMELS D. How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements[J]. Economic Modelling, 2007, 24(4): 611-635.
|
[26] |
吴福象, 朱蕾. 可计算一般均衡理论模型的演化脉络与应用前景展望——一个文献综述[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2014, 29(2): 95-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJYJ201402011.htm
|
[27] |
向洪金, 徐振宇, 李陈华. 全球视角下中国葡萄酒税收政策改革的经济与福利效应——基于可计算局部均衡模型的研究[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(5): 124-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201905008.htm
|
[28] |
GUEI K M A, MUGANO G. Revenue, welfare and trade effects of European Union Free Trade Agreement on South Africa[J]. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 2017, 20(1): 1-11.
|
[29] |
展进涛, 陈琦琦, 向洪金, 等. 全球视野下美国DDGS倾销对中国饲料产业的影响——基于COMPAS模型的模拟分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(5): 132-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201805010.htm
|
[30] |
SNYDER D, KICK E L. Structuralposition in the world system and economic growth, 1955-1970: a multiple-network analysis of transnational interactions[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1979, 84(5): 1096-1126.
|
[31] |
WILHITE A. Bilateraltrade and 'small-world' networks[J]. Computational Economics, 2001, 18(1): 49-64.
|
[32] |
SERRANO M A, BOGUNA M. Topology of theworld trade web[J]. PHYSICAL REVIEWE, 2003, 68(1): 634-646.
|
[33] |
陈银飞. 2000-2009年世界贸易格局的社会网络分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2011(11): 31-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMW201111003.htm
|
[34] |
孙晓蕾, 杨玉英, 吴登生. 全球原油贸易网络拓扑结构与演化特征识别[J]. 世界经济研究, 2012(9): 11-17, 87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JING201209004.htm
|
[35] |
AMADOR J, CABRAL S. Networks of value-added trade[J]. World Economy, 2017, 40(7): 1291-1313.
|
[36] |
王博, 陈诺, 林桂军. "一带一路"沿线国家制造业增加值贸易网络及其影响因素[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(3): 85-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMW201903007.htm
|
[37] |
BERGSTEN F, GARY C. Bridging thepacific: toward free trade and investment between China and the United States[M]. Washington: Peterson Institute Press, 2014: 3-30.
|
[38] |
冯宗宪, 何大纲. 开放经济下的国际贸易壁垒——变动效应·影响分析·政策研究[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2001: 342-346.
|
[39] |
BOWN C P, CROWLEY M A. Trade deflection and trade depression[J]. Journal of International Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 2007, 72(1): 176-201.
|
[40] |
WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440-442.
|
[41] |
WHITE H C, BOORMAN S A. Social structure from multiple networks. Ⅰ. block models of roles and positions[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 81(4): 730-780.
|
[42] |
李敬, 陈澍, 万广华, 等. 中国区域经济增长的空间关联及其解释——基于网络分析方法[J]. 经济研究, 2014, 49(11): 4-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ201411002.htm
|
[43] |
种照辉, 覃成林. "一带一路"贸易网络结构及其影响因素——基于网络分析方法的研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2017, 33(5): 16-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJTS201705002.htm
|
[44] |
韩冬, 李光泗. 中国与"一带一路"沿线国家粮食贸易格局演变与影响机制——基于社会网络学视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020(8): 24-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJWT202008004.htm
|
[45] |
NEMETH G, SZABO I. Estimation of armington elasticities in a CGE economy-energy-environment model for Europe[J]. Economic Modelling, 2011, 28(4): 1993-1999.
|
[46] |
于立宏, 贺媛. 能源替代弹性与中国经济结构调整[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(4): 30-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGYY201304004.htm
|
[47] |
KOIKE A, ITO K. Estimation of armington elasticities in Japan[J]. Infrastructure Planning Review, 2012, 68(5): 55-61.
|
[48] |
姚星, 梅鹤轩, 蒲岳. 国际服务贸易网络的结构特征及演化研究——基于全球价值链视角[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(4): 109-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMW201904008.htm
|
[49] |
吕延方, 方若楠, 王冬. 全球数字服务贸易网络的拓扑结构特征及影响机制[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38(10): 128-147. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLJY202110007.htm
|
[1] | WEI Jianwen, MA Jingsha, BAI Yunzhen, HAN Ziqiang. Building a Global Community of Health for All, China in Action——A Research on the Foreign Donation of Chinese Government during the COVID-19[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2022, 22(4): 29-39. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202204029 |
[2] | WANG Li-ke. Action Logic of the Local Government Pollution Control and the Public Environmental Struggle: Based on Game Theory Framework[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2016, 16(3): 24-28. |
[3] | CHEN Xiao-jun, ZONG Gang. Public Welfare of Rail Services in China: the Extensibility Analysis Based on the Public Choice Theory[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2015, 15(5): 28-32. |
[4] | LIU Yu-chen. Decrement and Reproduction of the Administrative Publicness in the Period of Transition[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2013, 13(5): 43-49. |
[5] | ZHENG Xu-wen, XU Zhen-dong. Function of the Public Participation in Public Policy under the Background of Diversification of Interest Pattern[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2013, 13(1): 41-47,53. |
[6] | HAO Jing. On the Corporate Property Rights of Non-governmental Colleges[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2011, 11(3): 62-66. |
[7] | WANG Xiang-jun. On the Protection of Peasant-worker's Rights and Interests[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2009, 9(3): 6-9,32. |
[8] | LIU Ai-jun. On Determination of Agricultural Land Ownership and Protecting the Legitimate Rights and Interests of Farmers[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2007, 7(1): 49-54. |
[9] | ZHONG Zhi-yong. Research on Procedural Prerequisite of Civil Tort Action of Securities[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2004, 4(1): 65-67. |
[10] | LI Ping, SUN Wei. Protection of Chinese Consumers' Rights and Interests in E-Business[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2002, 2(2): 37-40. |