孙博学, 聂祚仁, 高峰, 王志宏, 谢志辉. 中国能源生产的累计㶲需求分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2013, 39(11): 1734-1739.
    引用本文: 孙博学, 聂祚仁, 高峰, 王志宏, 谢志辉. 中国能源生产的累计㶲需求分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2013, 39(11): 1734-1739.
    SUN Bo-xue, NIE Zuo-ren, GAO Feng, WANG Zhi-hong, XIE Zhi-hui. Cumulative Exergy Demand (CExD) Analysis of Energy Production in China[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2013, 39(11): 1734-1739.
    Citation: SUN Bo-xue, NIE Zuo-ren, GAO Feng, WANG Zhi-hong, XIE Zhi-hui. Cumulative Exergy Demand (CExD) Analysis of Energy Production in China[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2013, 39(11): 1734-1739.

    中国能源生产的累计㶲需求分析

    Cumulative Exergy Demand (CExD) Analysis of Energy Production in China

    • 摘要: 以㶲理论为基础, 结合基于投入产出方法的清单计算模型, 计算了我国能源生产的累计㶲需求, 对不同能源产品的累计㶲需求进行了对比, 并分析了高次生产的㶲消耗在累计㶲需求中的比例.结果表明:供应1MJ的各能源产品, 电力的累计㶲需求最高, 为3.4MJ;其次为炼油产品、焦炭等其他二次能源, 为1.55~1.63MJ;初级化石能源最低, 为1.18~1.23 MJ.与基于流程的清单计算模型相比, 基于投入产出方法的清单计算模型更适用于分析能源系统.

       

      Abstract: Based on the theory of exergy, combined with input-output based inventory calculation model, the cumulative exergy demand (CExD) of energy production in China was calculated. The CExD of different energy carriers was compared and the proportion of exergy consumed in high tier of production layers in CExD was analyzed. The results show that for 1 MJ of different energy, electricity has the largest CExD with 3.4 MJ, followed by other secondary energy with 1.55- 1.63 MJ, and the CExD of primary fossil energy is the least with 1.18- 1.23 MJ. The results also show that input-output based inventory calculation model is more appropriate for the analysis of energy system than process based model.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回