张明聚, 谢治天, 刘耀轩, 杨萌, 张奇朋. 基坑工程钢楔式活络端力学性能试验研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2019, 45(12): 1223-1231. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2018030010
    引用本文: 张明聚, 谢治天, 刘耀轩, 杨萌, 张奇朋. 基坑工程钢楔式活络端力学性能试验研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2019, 45(12): 1223-1231. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2018030010
    ZHANG Mingju, XIE Zhitian, LIU Yaoxuan, YANG Meng, ZHANG Qipeng. Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Steel Wedge Active Node in Braced Excavation Engineering[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2019, 45(12): 1223-1231. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2018030010
    Citation: ZHANG Mingju, XIE Zhitian, LIU Yaoxuan, YANG Meng, ZHANG Qipeng. Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Steel Wedge Active Node in Braced Excavation Engineering[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2019, 45(12): 1223-1231. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2018030010

    基坑工程钢楔式活络端力学性能试验研究

    Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Steel Wedge Active Node in Braced Excavation Engineering

    • 摘要: 为了研究基坑工程中钢楔式活络端的力学性能,在北京市抽取4件钢楔式活络端,分3组在实验室进行轴向静力加载试验,得到4件活络端的承载性能、应力分布情况和破坏形态.基于试验结果,分析活络端的力学性能和应力分布的演变过程.结果表明:1)同一组活络端,单面楔时的屈服荷载和刚度低于子母楔时的屈服荷载和刚度,3组活络端屈服荷载和刚度有很大差别,不利于钢楔式活络端的品质控制;2)单厢式活络端的的最大应变发生在活动端与钢楔接触位置处,固定端应变很小,固定端最大应变值约为活动端最大应变值的1/50,约为钢楔处最大应变值的1/40;双厢式活络端的最大应变发生在活动端的箱体侧壁;3)单厢式活络端与双厢式活络端的破坏形态是截然不同的,单厢式活络端的破坏形态主要表现为中肋板与槽钢间的焊缝受剪力发生撕裂破坏,而双厢式活络端的破坏形态主要表现为侧壁失稳破坏及活动端底部屈服.

       

      Abstract: To study the mechanical characteristics of active nodes in excavation engineering, single axial compression tests on the nodes that were taken as specimens at the Beijing subway construction site were conducted in laboratory.The bearing capacity, stress distribution and failure mode of the specimens were obtained from the tests. Based on the experimental results, the stiffness, bearing capability and deformation capability in the key positions of the four specimens were analyzed. Results indicate that:1) For the specimens in the same group, both the yield load and the stiffness of the specimen with the unidirectional wedge are smaller than that of the specimen with the bidirectional wedge and for the specimens in different groups, and both the yield load and the stiffness of the specimens in 3 groups are quite different. 2) The maximum micro strain of the single-box active node occurs at the contact position between the movable end and the steel wedge, the micro strain of fixed end is very small. The maximum micro strain at the fixed end is about 1/50 of the active end, which is about 1/40 of the steel wedge, but the maximum micro strain of the double-box active node occurs at the side wall of the movable end box. 3) The failure mechanisms of single-boxactive node show that the rib in the middle position is pressed to yield and the welding seam between the rib in the middle position and the channel is cracked due to shear force action and those of double-box active node show that the rectangular-ambulatory-plane section of the movable end is yielded and the lateral walls of the movable end are in buckling damage.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回