速度脉冲型地震动作用下局部可液化场地响应

    Seismic Response of Local Liquefiable Site Under Ground Motions With Velocity Pulse

    • 摘要: 为研究速度脉冲效应对可液化场地的影响, 基于OpenSees平台建立有限元模型, 对近断层速度脉冲型地震动与无速度脉冲地震动作用下局部可液化场地的竖向位移、加速度时程、土体剪应力-应变、超孔隙水压力比、循环应力比等土体的响应差异进行研究。数值计算结果表明: 相同输入地震动幅值前提下, 无脉冲地震动作用下可液化土体的竖向永久位移与位移发展持时平均值比速度脉冲型地震动作用分别大13%、19%;而速度脉冲型地震动作用下土体最大剪应变是无速度脉冲地震动的约5.4倍, 最大剪应力约1.7倍; 速度脉冲效应使土体的剪应力-剪应变滞回圈所围面积更大但滞回圈数量较少, 且不同深度土体具有更大的循环应力比, 从而促进土体发生液化; 非液化密砂层放大地震动加速度幅值; 液化松砂层对地震加速度时程进行了高频滤波, 使地表加速度时程更为平滑且稀疏; 速度脉冲效应作用下液化土层超孔隙水压力比整体较小, 表明土体剪胀效应更加强烈。

       

      Abstract: To study the impact of velocity pulse effects on liquefiable sites, a finite element model was established based on the OpenSees platform to investigate the response differences of a local liquefiable site under the near-fault ground motions with and without velocity pulses, including the vertical displacement, acceleration time history, shear stress-strain of soil, excess pore water pressure ratio, and cyclic stress ratio. The numerical calculations show that, under the same amplitude of input ground motions, the average vertical permanent displacement and the duration of liquefiable soil under non-pulse ground motions are 13% and 19% higher than those under pulse ground motion, respectively. The maximum shear strain of liquefiable soil subjected to ground motions with velocity pulses is about 5.4 times higher than that of non-velocity pulse ground motion, and the maximum shear stress is about 1.7 times larger. Under the ground motions with velocity pulses, the liquefiable soil exhibits larger hysteretic shear stress-strain loops, but small numbers of hysteresis loops, as well as larger cyclic stress ratio for soil layers with different burial depths, which facilitates soil liquefaction. Moreover, non-liquefiable dense sand layer amplifies the seismic accelerations and liquefiable loose sand layer filtered the high-frequency contents of the seismic ground motions leading to smoother acceleration time histories on the ground surface. Under the ground motions with velocity pulses, the excess pore water pressures are generally smaller, indicating more significant dilatancy effects in the liquefiable soil than those under non-pulse ground motions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回