多模块适应性通风的污染物扩散控制性能研究——以应对教室使用情景变化为例

    Study of Pollutant Dispersion Control Performance of Multi-module Adaptive Ventilation —an Example of Coping With Changes in Classroom Usage Scenarios

    • 摘要: 提出了一种多模块适应性通风(multi-module adaptive ventilation, MAV)方法, 同时研究其在多场景类型建筑中面对室内场景变化和污染源位置变化时, 控制污染物扩散和排除污染物的性能。以一教室为模型, 利用计算流体动力学(computational fluid dynamics, CFD)技术模拟教室正常上课和集体讨论场景下的污染物分布情况, 并在正常上课场景下进行污染源位置变化的讨论。其中示踪气体CO2用于模拟感染者咳嗽产生的污染物。选用了5种不同的MAV模式和传统混合通风(mixing ventilation, MV)模式, 比较了它们在面对教室内不同污染源位置和不同场景时, 人员呼吸区的污染物浓度和去除率。结果表明合适的MAV模式下污染物在呼吸区的相对浓度更低、排除率更高, 其中MAV平行模式在集体讨论场景下、污染源位置为P3时的呼吸区污染物去除率(contaminant removal efficiency, CRE)是MV模式的7.52倍, 呼吸区相对污染物质量浓度Cr为MV模式的52.4%, 说明合适的MAV模式能更好地适应场景和污染源位置的变化。

       

      Abstract: A type of ventilation method, multi-module adaptive ventilation, hereinafter referred to as MAV, is proposed. At the same time, it studies to control the diffusion of pollutants in classroom buildings when facing with changes in indoor scenes and changes in the location of pollution sources and the ability to remove contaminants. Computational fluid dynamics technology was used to simulate the distribution of pollutants in the classroom in normal class and group discussion scenarios, and to change the location of pollution sources in the normal class scenario. The tracer gas (CO2) was used to simulate the pollutants produced by the cough of an infected person. Five different MAV modes and conventional mixed ventilation (MV) modes were selected to compare their pollutant concentrations and removal rates in the respiratory zone of personnel in the face of different pollutant source locations and different scenarios in the classroom. Results show that the relative concentration of pollutants in the breathing zone is lower and the exclusion rate is higher with the appropriate MAV mode, in which the pollutant removal rate (CRE) in the breathing zone of the MAV parallel mode is 7.52 times that of the MV mode in the group discussion scenario and the location of the pollutant source is P3, and the relative pollutant concentration Cr in the breathing zone is 52.4% of that in the MV mode, indicating that the appropriate MAV mode can better adapt to the scenario and the change of pollutant source location.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回