基于GF影像的不同融合方法对城市水体光谱保真度影响

    Influence of Different Fusion Methods Based on GF Images on the Spectral Fidelity of Urban Water

    • 摘要: 为了评价融合后遥感影像上城市水体的光谱保真度,以GF1和GF2影像为数据源,应用经典的4种融合方法:Brovey、Gram-schmidt Pan Sharpening、NNDiffuse Pan Sharpening和主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA),对GF1和GF2的全色影像和多光谱影像进行融合,并选取融合前后影像上的城市水体样本点,采用平均值、均方根误差(root mean square error,RMSE)、平均相对误差(mean relative error,MRE)来分析融合前后影像上城市水体波段偏差和波形保真度. 结果表明:在波段偏差上,GF1和GF2影像均是采用NNDiffuse Pan Sharpening方法最好;在波形保真度上,GF1影像采用NNDiffuse Pan Sharpening方法最好,GF2影像采用Gram-schmidt Pan Sharpening方法最好. 融合后的城市水体光谱保真度较好,可以进一步开展定量参数反演研究.

       

      Abstract: To evaluate the spectral fidelity of urban water body on the remote sensing images after fusion, GF1 and GF2 images were used as the data sources. Four classical fusion methods such as Brovey transform, Gram-schmidt pan sharpening, NNDiffuse pan sharpening and PCA transform, were applied to fuse the multispectral and panchromatic images of GF1 and GF2. Based on the urban water samples collected from the images before and after image fusion, the mean value, root mean square error (RMSE) and mean relative error (MRE) were used to analyze the wave band deviation and waveform fidelity of urban water body before and after image fusion. Results show that the NNDiffuse Pan Sharpening method is the best for both the GF1 and GF2 images on wave band deviation. The NNDiffuse Pan Sharpening method is best for the GF1 images and the Gram-schmidt Pan Sharpening method is best for the GF2 images on waveform fidelity. Overall, the spectral fidelity of fused urban water is better and quantitative research of water quality parameters can further carried out.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回