金善明. 论垄断行为入罪化的限度[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(6): 68-74.
    引用本文: 金善明. 论垄断行为入罪化的限度[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(6): 68-74.
    JIN Shanming. On the Limits of Criminalizing the Monopolistic Conducts in China[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2017, 17(6): 68-74.
    Citation: JIN Shanming. On the Limits of Criminalizing the Monopolistic Conducts in China[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2017, 17(6): 68-74.

    论垄断行为入罪化的限度

    On the Limits of Criminalizing the Monopolistic Conducts in China

    • 摘要: 反垄断法是垄断行为规制的制度性工具,其实施效果取决于责任体系的合理设置;《反垄断法》针对垄断行为已经设置民事和行政责任但并没有刑事责任的规定,因而是否应将垄断行为入罪化,一直是中国反垄断立法和执法中的争议点,责任设置应与法益保护需求相应适应;通过对《反垄断法》责任机制进行评估发现,既有的责任规范能够形成有效的威慑力,并对垄断行为予以有效规制,因而没有必要导入刑事责任制度。

       

      Abstract: Antimonopoly law is the institutional tool of regulating the monopolistic conducts, whose effects depend on establishing the reasonable responsibility system. As we know, Anti-Monopoly Law has set up the civil and administrative responsibilities but doesn't stipulate the criminal responsibility. Therefore, whether to criminalize the monopolistic conducts in China is the dispute points in the middle of antimonopoly legislation and enforcement for a long time. Theoretically speaking, the responsibility system should adapt to the demands of the legal interest protection. Based on the assessment of the responsibility mechanisms in Antimonopoly Law of China, the existing responsibility provisions have produced the powerful deterrent against the monopolistic practices actually, so it is unnecessary to introduce the criminal responsibility mechanism to the Law.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回