王洁, 林美卿, 刘明明. 正义与责任的限度:论戴维·米勒的全球正义观[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 16(1): 54-58.
    引用本文: 王洁, 林美卿, 刘明明. 正义与责任的限度:论戴维·米勒的全球正义观[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 16(1): 54-58.
    WANG Jie, LIN Mei-qing, LIU Ming-ming. Bound of Justice and Responsibility: on David Miller's View of Global Justice[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2016, 16(1): 54-58.
    Citation: WANG Jie, LIN Mei-qing, LIU Ming-ming. Bound of Justice and Responsibility: on David Miller's View of Global Justice[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2016, 16(1): 54-58.

    正义与责任的限度:论戴维·米勒的全球正义观

    Bound of Justice and Responsibility: on David Miller's View of Global Justice

    • 摘要: 进入21世纪后,正义问题特别是全球正义成为国外研究的热点,市场社会主义的著名代表人物戴维·米勒也转向了全球正义研究。米勒的全球正义理论包括:一是全球正义不等于全球平等主义,它维护民族国家的政治自主和世界的多样性;二是每个民族担负的后果责任与继承性责任是全球正义不可或缺的方面,它要求每个民族要对自己过去和现在的所作所为负责;三是全球正义不排斥民族的补救责任,其中以基本人权为底限。正确分析和把握米勒的全球正义观有着重要的理论和现实意义。

       

      Abstract: After entering the 21 th century,the problem of justice,especially the global justice,is becoming a hot spot of study abroad,the famous representative of market socialism,David miller,also turned to the study of global justice.Miller's theories of global justice included;firstly,the global justice was not equal to global egalitarianism,it maintained the national political independence and the diversity of the world;Secondly,each nation's consequent responsibility and inherited responsibility were indispensable for global justice,which required that each nation be responsible for their past and present actions;Thirdly,global justice was not exclusive to national remedial responsibility,which regarded basic human rights as a baseline.Analyzing and grasping Miller's global justice has the important theoretical and practical significance.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回