翟国强. 刑法明确性原则的宪法控制——基于比较法视角的分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(6): 59-67.
    引用本文: 翟国强. 刑法明确性原则的宪法控制——基于比较法视角的分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(6): 59-67.
    ZHAI Guoqiang. On the Constitutional Doctrine of Void for Vagueness[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2017, 17(6): 59-67.
    Citation: ZHAI Guoqiang. On the Constitutional Doctrine of Void for Vagueness[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2017, 17(6): 59-67.

    刑法明确性原则的宪法控制——基于比较法视角的分析

    On the Constitutional Doctrine of Void for Vagueness

    • 摘要: 从宪法学角度来判断刑法规范的明确性是立体刑法学的一个重要课题。基于比较法的研究,根据一般刑法理论,阐析法律明确性原则是刑法规范的形式正当性标准之一;从立体刑法学的立场来看,该原则也是宪法上衡量刑法合宪性的重要基准。在不同法律体系中,刑法明确性原则有其各自的理论和制度背景,通过对刑法明确性原则的宪法规范依据和适用的步骤方法进行比较,分析其中的法律技术和原理,以期为构建中国的刑法学理论体系提供镜鉴;运用交叉运用宪法和刑法的解释学原理,可以在宪法理论上证成刑法的明确性原则,并对该原则在刑法领域的落实提供宪法理论基础。

       

      Abstract: According to the general theory of the criminal law, clarity is one of the standards of legitimacy. But from the standpoint of the three-dimensional criminal law, the construction of this principle needs to go beyond the criminal law theory system and combine the whole legal system to make a comprehensive construction. From the perspective of the constitutional control, this principle is an important standard of constitutionality of the criminal law. The principle has its own theoretical and institutional background in different legal systems. But as legal methods, this legal principle is also an important technology which can provide reference for the construction of Chinese legal theory.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回