望超凡. 村治主体的“去精英化”:形成原因与治理后果——基于对皖南禾村的经验考察[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(3): 110-122. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202203110
    引用本文: 望超凡. 村治主体的“去精英化”:形成原因与治理后果——基于对皖南禾村的经验考察[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(3): 110-122. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202203110
    WANG Chaofan. "De elitism" from the Main Body of Village Governance: Causes and Consequences——Based on the Experience of He Village in South Anhui Province[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2022, 22(3): 110-122. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202203110
    Citation: WANG Chaofan. "De elitism" from the Main Body of Village Governance: Causes and Consequences——Based on the Experience of He Village in South Anhui Province[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2022, 22(3): 110-122. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202203110

    村治主体的“去精英化”:形成原因与治理后果——基于对皖南禾村的经验考察

    "De elitism" from the Main Body of Village Governance: Causes and Consequences——Based on the Experience of He Village in South Anhui Province

    • 摘要: “谁在治村”是基层治理研究领域中的重要议题。采用实地研究方法,通过对皖南禾村的治理变迁过程进行经验考察发现,来自基层政府的过度干预会导致村治主体的“去精英化”,并造成一系列意外后果。外部环境变迁让基层政府拥有了深度介入村级治理的动力和能力,通过调整村级治理的微观制度环境,基层政府可以将村级组织转变为自己的“派出机构”,村级治理的运作模式随之发生改变,集中表现为组织运转的单位化、治理事务的行政化与治理方式的规范化。在这一背景下,村干部岗位出现了全职化要求与“去价值化”特征,并且限制了对非正式治理手段的使用,这形成了对精英群体的排斥以及对普通村民的吸引,进而导致了村治主体的“去精英化”趋势。村治主体“去精英化”一方面推动了村级治理权力的开放化运行,另一方面则导致村级治理陷入了高成本、低效能的困境。因此,政府在制定农村治理策略时应将重点放在提高村庄社会的自治能力,而非将村级治理行政化。

       

      Abstract: "Who governs the village" is an important topic in the research of grass-roots governance. Through the field study of He village in southern Anhui, it is found that with the changes of the external environment, the grass-roots government gradually has the power and ability to deeply intervene in village governance. By adjusting the micro institutional environment of village level governance, the grass-roots government has changed the village level organization from "autonomous organization" to its own "agency" in rural society, and its operation mode has changed, which is mainly reflected in the unit of organization operation, the administration of governance affairs and the standardization of governance mode. In this context, the post of village cadres has the characteristics of full-time requirements and "de value", and limits the use of informal governance means, which forms the exclusion of elite groups and the attraction to ordinary villagers and leads to the trend of "de elite" from village governance subjects. On the one hand, the "de elitism" of village governance subjects promotes the open operation of village governance power, on the other hand, it leads to the rise of institutional cost and the decline of governance efficiency in the governance process.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回