王涵霏, 焦长权. 中国土地财政20年:构成与规模(1998—2017)[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(2): 26-38. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202102026
    引用本文: 王涵霏, 焦长权. 中国土地财政20年:构成与规模(1998—2017)[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(2): 26-38. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202102026
    WANG Hanfei, JIAO Changquan. Twenty Years of Land Finance: Structure and Scale (1998—2017)[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2021, 21(2): 26-38. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202102026
    Citation: WANG Hanfei, JIAO Changquan. Twenty Years of Land Finance: Structure and Scale (1998—2017)[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2021, 21(2): 26-38. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb202102026

    中国土地财政20年:构成与规模(1998—2017)

    Twenty Years of Land Finance: Structure and Scale (1998—2017)

    • 摘要: 在阐释学界对中国土地制度探讨的基础上,指出其中的焦点问题是土地“涨价归公”的制度和理念是否合理,而对“土地财政”的构成和规模展开充分的经验分析,是论证土地增值收益分配机制的基础性工作。研究发现:土地财政主要由土地出让金、土地税收和土地规费构成,具有以土地出让收入为主、以土地税收收入为辅的特点,是一种混合性质的公共收入。自1990年代后期以来,一方面,地方政府土地财政急速增加,成了地方财政的主要组成部分,地方政府高度依赖土地财政;另一方面,土地财政兼有地租、税收和金融性质,给地方政府带来了严峻的金融风险和政府性债务问题。土地财政是中国实现土地“涨价归公”的独特方式,但是土地“涨价归公”的理念是一个世界通则,与土地所有制的关系很弱;中国与西方国家的主要区别在于“涨价归公”的具体制度机制不同。

       

      Abstract: One of the key issues in the current discussion on China's land system is whether the system and concept of public appreciation of land price is reasonable. However, current dispute lacks the empirical analysis on the composition and scale of "land finance", which is of fundamental significance for demonstrating the distribution mechanism of land value-added income. It is found that land finance is mainly composed of land transfer income, land tax and land fees. It is a mixed public revenue. Since the late 1990s, land finance has grown rapidly, becoming an important composition to local fiscal system. Local governments have strong dependence on land finance. Land finance shares the characteristics of land rent, tax and finance, which makes local governments facing financial risks and debt issue.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回