刘亚秋. 从“文化自觉”到“文化创造性”——理解费孝通文化反思的一条线索[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(3): 39-46. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20200339
    引用本文: 刘亚秋. 从“文化自觉”到“文化创造性”——理解费孝通文化反思的一条线索[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(3): 39-46. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20200339
    LIU Yaqiu. From "Cultural Awareness" to "Cultural Creativity"——A Clue to Understand Fei Xiaotong's Cultural Reflection[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2020, 20(3): 39-46. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20200339
    Citation: LIU Yaqiu. From "Cultural Awareness" to "Cultural Creativity"——A Clue to Understand Fei Xiaotong's Cultural Reflection[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2020, 20(3): 39-46. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20200339

    从“文化自觉”到“文化创造性”——理解费孝通文化反思的一条线索

    From "Cultural Awareness" to "Cultural Creativity"——A Clue to Understand Fei Xiaotong's Cultural Reflection

    • 摘要: 对费孝通的“文化自觉”概念做进一步解读,既是为了回应当下世界范围内的文化大相遇问题,也是为了探寻文化自觉概念的深层意涵。费孝通提出的“文化自觉”概念,与保罗·利科在“世界文明与民族文化”中提到的“文化创造性”概念,大体关注的是同一个问题,即在当今世界文化大相遇下,如何保持自身文化的独立性以及创造性的问题。通过对比费孝通和保罗·利科的思想发现,费孝通的学术思想成长自后发展国家,他提出的“文化自觉”立足于文化大相遇时代中国文明的适应性问题,其深一层关怀便是“文化创造性”问题;他晚年在学术反思中既强调中国文化的独特性,也注意到文化自觉的个体层面。尽管二人的讨论内容有很大差异,但可以构成一种互相补充的关系;费孝通的“文化自觉”给出了一个圆满的结局,而保罗·利科的“文化创造性”则给出了文化发展的内在动力。

       

      Abstract: This article further interprets Fei Xiaotong's concept of "cultural awareness" in respond both to the world's cultural encounters and to the concept of cultural awareness. The "cultural awareness" concept by Fei Xiaotong and the concept of "cultural creativity" by Paul Ricoeur are generally concerned with the same issue, which is how to keep cultural independence and creativity in today's world culture encounter situation. By comparing the thoughts of Fei Xiaotong and Paul Ricoeur, it can be found that Fei Xiaotong's academic thoughts have developed from post-development countries. He raised the concept of "cultural awareness" from another standpoint of the world center, and based on the adaptation of Chinese civilization in the era of cultural encounter, the deeper concern of his concept of "cultural awareness" is the "cultural creativity". In fact, this is an individual problem. In his later academic reflections, Fei emphasized the uniqueness of Chinese culture, and also noted the individual level of cultural awareness, which can be seen from his emphasis on the "I" as the subject. Although the focus of their discussions are very different, their opinions can still form a mutually complementary relationship: Paul Ricoeur gives the intrinsic motivation for cultural development; Fei Xiaotong's "cultural awareness' gives a perfect solution.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回