张浩. 权宜性选用:转型期乡村社会纠纷解决的实践逻辑——以华北一起土地纠纷为例[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(3): 25-34. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20190325
    引用本文: 张浩. 权宜性选用:转型期乡村社会纠纷解决的实践逻辑——以华北一起土地纠纷为例[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(3): 25-34. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20190325
    ZHANG Hao. Expedient Choice: the Practical Logic of Rural Social Dispute Settlement——A Case of Land Disputes in North China[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2019, 19(3): 25-34. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20190325
    Citation: ZHANG Hao. Expedient Choice: the Practical Logic of Rural Social Dispute Settlement——A Case of Land Disputes in North China[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2019, 19(3): 25-34. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20190325

    权宜性选用:转型期乡村社会纠纷解决的实践逻辑——以华北一起土地纠纷为例

    Expedient Choice: the Practical Logic of Rural Social Dispute Settlement——A Case of Land Disputes in North China

    • 摘要: 讨论了乡村社会的纠纷解决实践与逻辑。指出转型中的乡村社会,存在着多种纠纷解决的途径和规则,供民众权宜性地选择使用,而且多种规则在共同推动纠纷解决的同时,也埋下了潜在的危机。这其中,司法途径虽有一定进步,但囿于内外局限,在民众那里并不享有优先或权威地位。认为法律的制订和实施,需要考虑民众的认知、感受与接受程度。

       

      Abstract: Following Weber's Sociology of law tradition, this paper discusses the process and mechanism of rural social dispute settlement and legal practice in the transition period. There are several ways and rules of dispute resolution in rural society, for the convenience of the people to choose and use. The judicial way has a certain progress, but because of the internal and external limitations, does not enjoy a priority or a position of authority. Coexistence of multiple rules competing with each other, jointly promotes the settlement of disputes, but also plants a potential crisis.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回