政策文件替代计量视角下的学术成果利用效率分布态势剖析

    Analysis of the Distribution of Utilization Efficiency of Academic Achievements from the Perspective of Policy Documents Altmetrics

    • 摘要: 政策文件替代计量作为时下热门研究领域altmetrics的重要组织部分,主要通过统计学术成果在政策文件中的提及频次测度其政策影响力。以Altmetric.com平台2012-2017年的政策文件替代计量数据为主要研究对象,从成果载体、内容客体、创作主体、资助来源等方面关注被利用学术成果元数据的多层次分布态势,以及学术成果使用对象分布情况,揭示政府关注学术成果的程度及使用效率差异,并测度学术成果利用效率指标在不同层次上的相关性与差异性。研究发现:医学保健学科、期刊The Lancet、机构Harvard Univ、资助机构National Institutes of Health的学术成果被政策文件利用次数较多;美国及机构World Health Organization是政策文件主要的利用对象,且多被本土所使用;资助机构National Institutes of Health主要被美国及机构National Academies Press所提及。中国的学术成果主要为瑞士所使用,中国国家自然科学基金会的学术成果主要被美国政策文件提及,而被机构利用效率相对较低。整体上,不同层次学术成果的传统指标与替代计量指标间的相关性较强,学术界与政治界主要关注的热点方向趋同。

       

      Abstract: Policy documents altmetrics is an important part of the current hot topic of research, mainly by measuring the frequency of mention of academic achievements in policy documents to measure its influence in policy. The measurement data of Altmetric.com Platform 2012-2017 was used as the main research object, and the multi-level distribution of the metadata of the academic achievements being used is taken into account from the results carrier, content object, creative subject, and funding sources, as well as the academic achievements, it reveals the extent to which the government pays attention to the academic achievements and the difference in the use efficiency, and measures the relevance and differences of the utilization indexes of academic achievements at different levels. The study found that the academic achievements of medical and health sciences, "The Lancet" journal, "Harvard Univ" institution, and "National Institutes of Health" funding agency were used more frequently by policy documents; the United States and the "World Health Organization" institution were the main use targets of policy documents and were mostly localized. The National Institutes of Health, a funding agency, is primarily referred to by the United States and the National Academies Press. The academic achievements of China are mainly used by Switzerland. The academic achievements of the National Natural Science Foundation of China are mainly mentioned in the USA policy documents, and the utilization efficiency of institutions is relatively low. As a whole, the correlation between the traditional and altmetrics indicators of academic achievements is relatively strong, and the focus of attention in the academic and political has converged.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回