行动与历史:吴文藻与费孝通在社会学本土化取向上的间距

    Action and History: the Distance Between Wu Wenzao and Fei Xiaotong in the Sociology Localization Orientation

    • 摘要: 针对中国社会学的本土化这一较具争议性的话题进行了探讨,试图回到吴文藻与费孝通两位跨代社会学大师那里,重新审视他们对于社会学本土化的观点。通过梳理发现,两人既有关联性也有实质上的区别:吴文藻在社会学本土化问题上所持的是以“行动”为取向的社区研究,费孝通则一直践行着吴文藻所提倡的社区研究;而与吴文藻研究所不同的是,费孝通认为社区研究也可以有历史维度,特别是在其晚年的学术反思中愈加突出历史维度在社会学研究中的重要性。两人虽在社会学本土化取向上存在着间距,但对当代中国社会学建设均有积极的倡导意义,即中国社会学在坚持一贯的“行动”取向之外,“历史”维度取向的社会学研究将丰富和确证中国社会学的“自性”。

       

      Abstract: The localization of Chinese sociology has always been a more controversial topic. So this article attempts to recall two great sociologists, Wu Wenzao and Fei Xiaotong, to re-examine their opinions about the localization of sociology. By sorting out the two sociologists opinions, we found they have not only associations, but also a real difference between them:Wu holds "action" as his orientation in the community study of the localization of sociology; but Fei, although he has been practicing the community research which Wu advocats, he thinks the community research can also have the historical dimension. Especially in his later academic reflection years, he more and more highlights the importance of historical dimensions in the sociological study. Therefore the meaning of distance between two sociologists in the sociology localization orientation is that, besides Chinese sociology insists on "action" orientation, the "history" dimension orientation of sociological study will enrich and corroborate the "self" of Chinese sociology.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回