新质生产力视角下国家重点研发计划项目技术成果转化绩效评价指标体系研究

    Research on the Performance Evaluation Index System for Technological Achievement Transformation of National Key R&D Programs of China from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces

    • 摘要: 发展新质生产力对构建科技创新成果转化绩效评价指标体系提出了新要求。如何结合国家重点研发计划项目特点,构建科学合理的技术成果转化绩效评价指标体系,成为加快推进产学研深度融合、加速形成新质生产力的重要议题。基于新质生产力的内涵,梳理新质生产力与科技创新的关系及其对技术成果转化的八个要求,即创新性、精准性、高效性、可持续性、普及性、协同性、安全性和开放性。通过对国家重点研发计划典型实践案例进行分析,指出当前国家重点研发计划技术成果转化过程中存在的主要问题。构建新质生产力视角下的国家重点研发计划项目技术成果转化绩效评价指标体系,并提出:(1)加强政策支持和资金投入;(2)加快人才培育,完善激励机制;(3)加强产学研合作,构建公共服务平台;(4)优化评价体系,推广成功案例等四个方面的政策建议。

       

      Abstract: The development of new quality productive forces has put forward new requirements for building a performance evaluation index system for the transformation of scientific and technological innovation achievements. According to the characteristics of National Key R&D Programs of China, how to construct a scientific and reasonable performance evaluation index system for technological achievement transformation has become an important issue in accelerating the formation of new quality productive forces and the deep integration of industry, academia and research. Based on the connotation of new quality productive forces and the relationships between new quality productivity and technological innovation, the eight requirements of the technological achievements transformation have been summarized, namely innovation, precision, efficiency, sustainability, popularization, synergy, safety, and openness. By analyzing the typical practice cases, the problems of the technological achievement transformation of the National Key R&D Programs have been pointed out. A comprehensive performance evaluation index system for technological achievement transformation of the National Key R&D Programs from the perspective of new quality productive forces has been constructed, and the following four policy recommendations have been proposed: (1) strengthening policy support and funding investment; (2) accelerating talent cultivation and improving incentive mechanisms; (3) strengthening industry-university-institute cooperation and building the public service platform; (4) optimizing the evaluation system and promoting successful cases.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回