资源配置视角下企业气候行动对绿色创新影响的异质性分析

    Mechanism and Heterogeneity Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Climate Action Paths on Green Innovation from the Perspective of Resource Allocation

    • 摘要: 绿色创新作为新质生产力的“集成器”,是应对气候变化风险的重要抓手和保障,是驱动企业产业转型升级的“加速器”。基于资源配置视角,构建气候行动与绿色创新的理论分析框架和多元回归模型,并以中国A股上市公司为研究对象,采用2008—2023年的面板数据分析企业不同气候行动路径对绿色创新数量和质量的影响机制与情景依赖。研究结果显示:(1)大多数企业的气候行动以满足监管需求为导向,基本停留在方针制定、机构设置和信息有限披露阶段。分阶段考察不同气候行动路径对绿色创新影响的异质性,发现绿色创新驱动因素由第一阶段以资源协调为主的治理结构引领渐渐转变为第二阶段以社会利益相关方为基础的气候绩效目标披露;(2)分类型考察不同气候行动对绿色创新数量和质量影响的异质性,结果显示气候治理机制与绿色创新数量显著正相关,与绿色创新质量相关性较弱;气候目标绩效尽管披露较少,但与绿色创新质量显著正相关;(3)企业气候行动对绿色创新的影响存在最佳水平和边际效用递减。该影响在资本技术密集型企业、成长型企业和非国有企业中更明显;在不同的气候行动中气候治理机制对绿色创新的倒“U”型关系最显著;(4)数字化在企业气候行动影响绿色创新作用中发挥部分正向中介效应,融资约束和代理成本发挥部分负向中介效应。财政补贴和组织松弛正向调节气候行动对绿色创新的促进作用。

       

      Abstract: Green innovation, as an "integrator" of new quality productivity, is an important lever and guarantee for addressing climate change risks, and an "accelerator" for driving enterprise industrial transformation and upgrading. Based on the perspective of resource allocation, a theoretical analysis framework and multiple regression model for climate action and green innovation are constructed. Chinese A-share listed companies are taken as the research objects, and panel data from 2008 to 2023 are used to analyze the impact mechanism and scenario dependence of different climate action paths of enterprises on the quantity and quality of green innovation. The research results show that: (1) Most companies' climate action is guided by meeting regulatory needs, and basically stays at the stage of policy formulation, institutional setting, and limited information disclosure. Examine the heterogeneity of the impact of different climate action paths on green innovation in stages, and the driving factors of green innovation gradually shift from the governance structure led by resource coordination in the first stage to climate performance target disclosure based on social stakeholders in the second stage; (2) The heterogeneity of the impact of different climate action paths on the quantity and quality of green innovation is examined by classification. The results show that climate governance mechanisms are significantly positively correlated with the quantity of green innovation, but weakly correlated with the quality of green innovation; Although there is relatively little disclosure of climate target performance, it is significantly positively correlated with the quality of green innovation; (3) The impact of corporate climate action on green innovation has an optimal level and diminishing marginal utility. This impact is more pronounced in capital technology intensive enterprises, growth oriented enterprises, and non-state-owned enterprises; The inverted U-shaped relationship between climate governance mechanisms and green innovation is most significant in different climate action pathways. (4) Digitization plays a partially positive mediating role in the impact of corporate climate action on green innovation, while financing constraints and agency costs play a partially negative mediating role. Financial subsidies and organizational relaxation positively regulate the promoting effect of climate action on green innovation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回