正规与非正规:就业模式对农民工工作贫困的影响——来自八个城市的经验证据

    Standard and Non-standard: the Influence of Employment Models on the in-Work Poverty of Migrant Workers: Empirical Evidence from Eight Big Cities

    • 摘要: 利用2017年流动人口卫生计生动态监测专题调查数据,对不同就业模式农民工的规模、工作贫困的风险、致贫影响因素及机制进行了研究。结果表明,非正规就业是农民工在大城市就业的主要模式,占比高达81%,其中非正规受雇就业占比42%,自雇就业占比39%,正规受雇就业占比则仅为19%。在就业效果上,较之正规受雇农民工,非正规受雇农民工的贫困发生比率高出25.6%,自雇就业农民工则无显著差异;造成不同就业模式农民工工作贫困风险差异的劳动力市场机制主要是较低的小时工资,但其他的致贫因素则既有共性也有差异。提出对农民工工作贫困问题的治理需要分类施策,一方面,完善劳动力市场政策,提高最低工资水平,加强劳动法的执法力度;另一方面,完善家庭儿童照料和养老保障相关政策,提高农民工家庭去家庭化和去商品化程度。

       

      Abstract: This paper analyzes the scale of rural migrant workers with different employment models and their risks of in-work poverty, as well as the mechanism and constraints of in-work poverty based on the National Migrant Population Health and Family Planning Dynamic Monitoring Survey Data of 2017. The result shows that 81% of the migrant workers in the surveyed cities are employed in the non-standard employment model, while only 19% in the standard employment model. Compared with the standardly employed migrant workers, the poverty risk of non-standardly employed migrant workers is 25.6% higher, while the self-employed migrant workers have no significant divergence. Low hour wages is the main labor market mechanism that causes differences of in-work poverty risk among migrant workers in different employment models. As for other factors, both similarities and differences exist among different employment models. The main suggestion of this paper is to deal with the problems of migrant workers' working poverty according to the divergences of their employment models and poverty constraints. On one hand, the labor market policy should be improved by raising the minimum wage level and strengthening the enforcement of labor law; On the other hand, the family policy and pension policy should be improved to raise the degree of de-familiarization and de-commercialization of migrant workers' families.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回